The Crown argues the judge who heard the woman’s trial improperly limited the testimony of two doctors.
Published Mar 13, 2025 • Last updated 36 minutes ago • 2 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
A photo of 18-month-old Emerson Whitby, supplied to the Regina Leader-Post with permission to print from the family. (supplied by Riley Jolly)supplied
Article content
The judge who heard the trial of a Regina mother acquitted of manslaughter in the death of her toddler set the bar too high for expert testimony, the Crown now argues on appeal.
Chelsea Whitby’s son, Emerson, was 18 months old on June 10, 2020 when he suddenly died. Autopsy results showed the cause of death to be subdural hemorrhage caused by a significant blunt force trauma to the head.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Regina Leader-Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
Whitby was originally charged with second-degree murder in the death. What, and potentially who, caused that trauma was a question at issue in the proceedings, which saw testimony from a number of medical doctors.
The Crown eventually sought a conviction for the lesser offence of manslaughter, of which the mother was acquitted in September 2023. An appeal was brought by the Crown before the month was out.
But a fulsome written argument on the matter was not filed until late last month, with the legal document containing the Crown’s arguments (known as a factum) dated February 28.
The factum, signed by Crown lawyer Anthony Gerein, states that the judge who presided over Whitby’s trial improperly limited the scope of the testimony of two doctors. Those doctors, the factum argues, have done enough work and demonstrated enough specialized knowledge to offer testimony that “touches on skull and brain injuries and symptoms.”
According to the factum, the doctors were not allowed to testify about some aspects of the case, including providing certain opinion evidence about what caused Emerson’s injuries.
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“With respect, the trial judge erred at law by setting the threshold too high to qualify both experts,” the document states, suggesting their evidence was “material” to the issue of the timing and cause of death.
In its initial notice, the Crown indicated another ground of appeal, alleging the trial judge failed to hear admissible evidence. However, this leg of argument has been abandoned, according to the Crown’s factum.
Whitby has not yet filed her own written argument and no date has yet been set for the court to hear the appeal.
Recommended from Editorial
Crown files appeal in Whitby toddler death case
Woman found not guilty in 2020 death of 18-month-old son
— with files from Larissa Kurz
bharder@postmedia.com
The Regina Leader-Post has created an Afternoon Headlines newsletter that can be delivered daily to your inbox so you are up to date with the most vital news of the day. Click here to subscribe.
With some online platforms blocking access to the journalism upon which you depend, our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news, so make sure to bookmark leaderpost.com and sign up for our newsletters so we can keep you informed. Click here to subscribe.