During the early 1970s, the air in many American cities was … brown. Pollution muddied clear skies and sickened people across the country. The Clean Air Act helped change that. But the law’s future is cloudy.
The Nixon-era law is “under attack,” said The American Prospect. The Clean Air Act (CAA) passed in 1970, enshrining the “right of Americans to breathable air” and empowering the newly created Environmental Protection Agency to regulate pollutants. Industry lawsuits have always threatened to undermine the legislation’s effectiveness, and those efforts are multiplying. Moves by Congressional Republicans and the Trump administration could also weaken the CAA and the “clean air that we now take for granted.”
What is the history of the Clean Air Act?
Polluted air in midcentury America could be deadly. In 1948, “lethal clouds” of pollution inflicted a “score of deaths” and sickened thousands more in Donora, Pennsylvania, said Smithsonian Magazine. The United Kingdom — famous for its coal-choked air — passed air pollution restrictions in 1956. The United States passed its own laws in 1955, 1963 and 1967, culminating in 1970 with the Clean Air Act that “empowered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine safe limits and regulate six major air pollutants” in everything from coal-fired power plants and factories to smog-spewing cars, lawnmowers and beyond. (The list expanded to 189 “potential threats” by 2022.) The results were noticeable: Carbon monoxide levels “dropped by about 90% in large American cities.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week’s Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
California gets waivers from the law. Why?
The EPA “has granted California more than 75 waivers” since the Clean Air Act became law. These waivers have allowed the state to impose vehicle emissions rules that are tougher federal standards, said CBS News. It is a grandfathering situation: The Golden State regulated car emissions long before the CAA went into effect. California’s legal power on this topic has had ripple effects: The CAA allows “other states to adopt California’s vehicle emissions standards.” Thus, tougher regulations coming out of Sacramento can affect automotive industry sales in more than a dozen other states.
What are the Clean Air Act’s benefits?
The air is “visibly cleaner” and “safer to breathe” in many American communities, said the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Fine particulate matter pollution” is the “deadliest” form of pollution, but it has declined by 41% since 1990. Ozone pollution has also dropped by 22%. One study found the law prevents as many as 370,000 premature deaths a year. The Clean Air Act is the “most powerful public health law enacted in the twentieth century in the United States,” Paul Billings, a senior vice president at the American Lung Association, said to National Geographic for the law’s 50th anniversary in 2020.
What are the criticisms?
Business groups argue the regulations are too costly, said The New York Times. During a quintennial review of EPA regulations in 2023, a “coalition of major industries” said there no room would be “left for new economic development” if the agency adopted tough standards to combat climate change. The costs of the rules “are extremely high,” said Chad Whiteman of the Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute, and “you start bumping into unintended consequences.” Under President Joe Biden, those costs were offset somewhat through a “green bank” to finance clean energy projects, said the Times, as well as other funding to “help heavy industries retrofit to lower their carbon emissions.”
What next?
The Trump administration said in March it is “reconsidering” more than 30 air pollution rules under the act, said The Conversation. The deregulatory effort is intended to “roll back trillions in regulatory costs and hidden ‘taxes’ on U.S. families.” The question is whether the “economic and health benefits” of air pollution restrictions will persist.
